Le potentiel d’offre et de demande de services médicaux dans la langue de communautés minoritaires : où se situe le français en Colombie-Britannique?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une étude comparative du potentiel de services médicaux dans les langues minoritaires de Colombie-Britannique révèle que des médecins non-francophones parlant français génèrent une retombée linguistique qui amplifie l’offre potentielle de services de santé et de services sociaux en français de façon dramatique. Ce mécanisme structurant s’appliquerait aux autres professions de la santé et des services sociaux, partout au Canada et il serait plus prononcé plus le contexte est minoritaire. Les communautés francophones doivent faire plus pour identifier, engager et outiller les professionnels et professionnelles « francophiles » et elles doivent élaborer une logique d’équité innovatrice pour dégager le potentiel d’offre de services de santé et de services sociaux en français dans un contexte multilingue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".