MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994805141 · doi:10.7448/ias.17.4.19507

Large disparities in HIV treatment cascades between eight European and high‐income countries – analysis of break points

2014· article· en· W1994805141 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alice Raymond, Andrew Hill, Anton Pozniak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International AIDS Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Incidence (geometry)Transmission (telecommunications)High income countriesAntiretroviral therapyViral loadHIV diagnosisEnvironmental healthPediatricsFamily medicineDeveloping countryEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Patients on antiretroviral treatment with undetectable HIV RNA levels have a significantly lower risk of clinical disease progression and onward HIV transmission. This study aimed to estimate and compare the percentage of all HIV-positive people who are diagnosed, are linked to care, are taking antiretroviral treatment and have undetectable HIV RNA, in eight European and high-income countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Australia, British Columbia (Canada) and Georgia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each country, the number of people in five key stages of the HIV treatment cascade was collected: 1. HIV infected, 2. Known to be HIV positive, 3. Linked to care, 4. Taking antiretroviral treatment, and 5. Having undetectable HIV RNA. Estimates were extracted from national reports (1-3), the UNAIDS database, conference proceedings (4) and peer-reviewed articles (5-7). The quality of the estimates and reporting methods were assessed individually for each country, with selection criteria such as availability of nationwide database and routinely collected data. Treatment cascades were constructed using estimates from 2010 to 2012. RESULTS: As shown in Table 1, the percentage of all infected people with undetectable HIV RNA ranged from 20% in Georgia to 59% in Denmark. Of the high-income countries, the United States has the lowest percentage of individuals with undetectable viral load (25% to median 52%), associated with the highest HIV incidence rate (15.30 per 100,000 to median 6.07 per 100,000). The pattern of the cascades differed between countries: in the United States, there is a fall from 66% to 33% (-33%) between linkage to care and start of antiretroviral treatment. However, in Georgia, the greatest loss in continuum was zat diagnosis, with 48% of undiagnosed HIV-positive individuals. CONCLUSIONS: There are great disparities among European and high-income countries in the percentage of HIV-positive individual with undetectable HIV RNA. Furthermore, the treatment cascades show different key break points, underlying inequalities in HIV care between countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International AIDS SocietySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207