MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994810431 · doi:10.1007/s100240010118

Pathology of the Pediatric Regio Inguinalis: Mysteries of the Hernia Sac Exposed

2000· review· en· W1994810431 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInguinal herniaHerniaGeneral surgerySurgical pathologySurgeryHistopathological examinationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries performed on children. However, the value of routine histologic examination of hernia sac tissues continues to be debated. Although the surgical pathology of herniorrhaphy tissues is usually simple, occasional examples have unexpected findings that potentially lead to inappropriate management or that have added clinical implications. These along with surgical-quality assurance issues need to be considered in cost-benefit arguments. This article reviews basic histology, common potential pitfalls, and significant unexpected conditions encountered in the surgical pathology of the inguinal hernia sac in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207