MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994813042 · doi:10.1300/j044v10n01_08

Milk Thistle,<i>Silybum marianum</i>(L.) Gaertn., Flower Head Development and Associated Marker Compound Profile

2003· article· en· W1994813042 on OpenAlex
Danielle Julie Carrier, T.G. Crowe, Shahab Sokhansanj, B. Barl

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSilymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilybum marianumMilk ThistleBiologyHorticultureThistleDry weightBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Flower head development and marker compound changes were examined for milk thistle grown under dryland conditions during the 1998 and 1999 growing seasons. Flower heads harvested at the early flowering, mid-flowering, late flowering, and dehiscing (seed development) growth stages had average seed/ovule weights of 5 mg, 13 mg, 21 mg, and 26 mg, respectively. At the time of harvest, the plants contained flower heads at all stages of development. During the 1999 harvest, the average plant produced 2.0 g, 2.9 g, and 3.4 g of dry seeds per flower head, corresponding to mid-flowering, late flowering, and dehiscing development stages of the flower. The silymarin and fixed-oil content for the 1999 seeds were 1 mg, 14 mg, and 24 mg of silymarin and 15 mg, 168 mg, and 252 mg of lipid/g dry weight for mid-flowering, late flowering, and dehiscing development stages, respectively. The highest silymarin yield was obtained from late flowering and dehiscing flower heads in early September of both test years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it