MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994818818 · doi:10.1353/boc.0.0024

Conscience on Stage: The Comedia as Casuistry in Early Modern Spain (review)

2009· article· en· W1994818818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frederick A. de Armas

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Comediantes · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasuistryConscienceMoralitySubject (documents)ExorcismPhilosophyArtLiteratureTheologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Conscience on Stage: The Comedia as Casuistry in Early Modern Spain Frederick A. De Armas Kallendorf, Hilaire. Conscience on Stage: The Comedia as Casuistry in Early Modern Spain. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 299 pp. Hilaire Kallendorf, in a fascinating critical move, has turned from exorcism to casuistry. In her earlier book, Exorcism and Its Texts (Toronto, 2003), Kallendorf showed that, because the devil was thought to be able to enter bodily organs and infect the memory, the imagination, and even the seat of reason, possession could threaten notions of selfhood. Now, she evinces the instability of this selfhood as it is faced with "case morality." Very much like exorcisms that detached devilish forces from the self, casuistry serves to calm moral qualms, or perhaps it exacerbates them. In Conscience on Stage, Kallendorf connects answers concerning case morality given by confessors to the ethical dilemmas faced by characters in the Spanish comedia. Her book begins with a learned and very useful overview of the history of casuistry, which shows how Spanish Jesuits in early modern Spain brought the practice to its heights. Professorships on the subject became common as sermons discussed the many issues involved; books on the subject were published in Latin and in the vernacular. Sermons and speeches were given, often taking a dialogic and even theatrical format. After all, casuistry moved from general moral principles to specific circumstances. The devil was in the details, and participants at a lecture were given the opportunity to present different resolutions and extenuating circumstances. Kallendorf asserts, "Any situation involving choice among various options could invoke the principles of casuistry to prioritize levels of virtue and vice as they appeared relative to one another" (11). Indeed, she shows how plays written and performed in Jesuit schools may have been the impetus for the uses of casuistry on the secular Spanish stage; after all, schools were performing plays long before Lope de Vega burst upon the scene. Kallendorf also point out that a number of playwrights had studied with the Jesuits in their youth and that many became priests in later life. They would thus be most familiar with the Jesuit vision of theater as pulpit. [End Page 141] Having demonstrated how casuistry is possibly a key factor in the mindset of playwrights, Kallendorf sets out to prove her case, to show that "cases of conscience" were central to early modern drama. First, she shows how the term "case" pervades the vocabulary of these plays. Cases are constructed and verified; the language of fault and blame is ever-present; and the question of what to do is often asked, as well as the question of what the punishment should be. She argues that term acaso is used when guilt is only postulated; ocasión is interpreted as the occasion for sin, etc. From the analysis of language, Kallendorf concludes that "we might see words like caso, intento or ocasión as present marks of an absent confessor, the phantasm who hovers over the comedia text … many casuistical speeches in the comedias are introduced by a single hallmark question: 'What should I do?'" (63). Although one might argue that ocasión is a term of classical provenance and of visual impact, because it is the subject of a number of emblems, this does not mean that it cannot also contain a casuistic valance. No matter how appealing Kallendorf's approach might be, we must be careful not to use it indiscriminately and reduce terms to narrow meanings. Kallendorf's discussion of the term "What to do?" is particularly engaging. Here, she looks at moral dilemmas and conflicting duties, to hierarchies of virtue and vice, to the double bind, and to recognition and confession. Memorable characters from the comedias, from Catalinón to Sancho Ortiz, and from Rosaura to Mencía, show their concern for these important issues, and Kallendorf makes a strong case for their casuistic link. The question "What to do?" even surfaces when characters ask it of honor, of fate, of the heavens, and of demons (123-27). Other important insights surface in this clearly-written and well-structured book, such as the degree of culpability in Casandra's...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the ComediantesSame topicEarly Modern Spanish LiteratureFrench-language works237,207