MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994833196 · doi:10.1139/y05-087

Regulation of myosin light chain phosphatase and pulmonary arterial relaxation

2005· review· en· W1994833196 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shyamala Dakshinamurti

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyosin-light-chain phosphataseMyosin light-chain kinaseInternal medicineDephosphorylationPhosphorylationEndocrinologyMyosinPhosphataseCirculatory systemPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyMedicineBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal circulatory transition is dependent upon tightly regulated pulmonary circuit relaxation. Persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), a rapidly progressive disease of pulmonary arterial vasospasm and remodelling, may be characterized by pulmonary arterial myocyte relaxation failure. A key regulator of vascular tone is myocyte calcium sensitivity, determined by the relative stoichiometry of myosin light chain phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. We have recently reported downregulation of myosin light chain phosphatase activity in a hypoxic model of neonatal pulmonary hypertension. This review examines the recognized pathways of regulation governing myosin light chain phosphatase activity, including targeting subunit isoform switching, targeting unit phosphorylation and catalytic site inhibition. In light of the reviewed literature, further speculation is proposed on the potential contributions of these mechanisms to the pathophysiology of the perinatal pulmonary arterial relaxation defect in PPHN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207