MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1994884821 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638609

Orthogonally-distributed space-time block codes for relay channels

2013· article· en· W1994884821 on OpenAlexaff
Gongjin Chen, Jian‐Kang Zhang, K.M. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalityBlock codeDiversity gainRelaySpace–time block codeComputer scienceAlgorithmDetectorMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Topology (electrical circuits)Block (permutation group theory)Coding gainMatrix (chemical analysis)Coding (social sciences)Decoding methodsMathematicsTelecommunicationsCombinatoricsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The direct application of orthogonal space-time block coding (OSTBC) for multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) systems to distributed cooperative relay networks makes the equivalent channel matrix for maximum likelihood (ML) detection lose its orthogonality. Hence, this paper proposes a new design that makes the channel matrix be orthogonally distributed (OD) for a suboptimal symbol-by-symbol detector (SBSD). Using ODSTBC, an asymptotic symbol error probability (SEP) formula with SBSD is derived, showing the optimal diversity gain function is achieved. In addition, two kinds of ODSTBC designs for the distributed relay networks are presented, which interestingly renders that SBSD is equivalent to the ML detector. Numerical results verify the diversity analysis and indicate competitive error performance to currently available orthogonal distributed STBC designs with much simpler complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→