MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Nitrogen and Oxygen on Biofilter Performance

2002· article· en· W1994891012 on OpenAlex
Beatrice Minuth, D. Grant Allen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofilterOxygenNitrogenChemistryMethanolEnvironmental chemistryLimiting oxygen concentrationBiodegradationInertEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three laboratory-scale biofilters packed with inert material were used to study the nitrogen and oxygen requirements for biofiltration of methanol. Mixtures of methanol with inorganic nitrogen (NH3 or NO3) at nitrogen-to-carbon (N:C) ratios ranging from 0.015 to 0.4 were employed to reveal nitrogen effects on biofiltration. In the oxygen study, mixtures of air and oxygen at different oxygen contents were used. At low nitrogen levels, the removal rate increased with increasing N:C ratio for both NH3 and NO3. However, at high concentrations, NH3 had an inhibitory effect on biodegradation while the removal rate reached a plateau at high NO3 concentrations. Biofiltration with 63% oxygen in the inlet gas stream increased the maximum removal rate from 120 to 145 g/m3/hr after 3 days in comparison with biofiltration with air. However, a further increase in oxygen content up to 80% did not lead to a further improvement in biofilter performance, suggesting that both oxygen and biofilm thickness can be the relevant factors limiting biofilter performance and creating the plateau in removal rates at high loadings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it