MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994914136 · doi:10.1116/1.1701856

X-ray-induced recombination effects in a-Se-based x-ray photoconductors used in direct conversion x-ray sensors

2004· article· en· W1994914136 on OpenAlexaff
Bud Fogal, M. Z. Kabir, Stephen K. O’Leary, Robert E. Johanson, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-rayX-ray detectorElectronPhotoconductivityRecombinationAmorphous solidPhysicsDetective quantum efficiencySemiconductorScintillatorAtomic physicsDetectorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryCrystallographyNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stabilized amorphous selenium (a-Se) is currently used as an x-ray photoconductor in direct conversion flat-panel digital x-ray image detectors. Therefore, there is much interest in x-ray-induced effects in a-Se, especially changes in charge carrier lifetimes that result from x-ray exposure. We have observed that the exposure of an a-Se x-ray detector sample to x rays induces negative capture centers in the bulk and thereby reduces the hole lifetime. By using conventional and interrupted field time-of-flight (IFTOF) transient photoconductivity techniques in a TOF-IFTOF-TOF sequence, we were able to develop a technique that allows the measurement of the capture coefficient Cr between free holes and x-ray-induced negative centers, which we believe to be trapped electrons. We find that the capture process follows the Langevin recombination mechanism, the same recombination mechanism that has been observed in the case of recombination between free holes and free electrons in a-Se. We have shown that the concentration of x-ray-induced negative centers increases almost linearly with the x-ray exposure. As a corollary, in terms of fundamental physics of amorphous semiconductors, we can also conclude that the influence of potential fluctuations in the noncrystalline structure in shielding a charged center in a-Se is relatively small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207