MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994919275 · doi:10.1021/ef100173j

Chemistry and Association of Vanadium Compounds in Heavy Oil and Bitumen, and Implications for Their Selective Removal

2010· article· en· W1994919275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVanadiumAsphalteneChemistryAbsorbanceFraction (chemistry)CatalysisExtended X-ray absorption fine structureInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryAbsorption spectroscopyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most crude oils contain traces of vanadium, which cause significant detrimental impact during catalytic conversion and combustion. The concentrations in bitumen and vacuum residue are generally much higher, which poses a problem for the economical upgrading of these feedstocks. These problems are relevant since the world reserves of conventional light oils are dwindling and being replaced by an increasing amount of heavier feedstocks. In this article, the current understanding of the distribution and form of vanadium compounds within vacuum residue is critically discussed. The implications of this chemistry on prospects for new separation methods, other than deasphalting, are considered. Although only a small fraction of the vanadium is contained within the polar resin fraction (i.e., maltenes), this fraction has been most often characterized to determine the chemical form of the vanadium compounds. Various spectroscopic techniques have been used to determine that these resin soluble vanadium compounds exist as metalloporphyrins characterized by their intense absorption of UV/visible radiation. In the case of the asphaltene bound metals, this UV/visible absorbance is not observed and has historically led to their distinction as “non-porphyrins”. However, more recent results using X-ray spectroscopies (EXAFS and XANES), as well as a more in depth analysis of the UV/vis response of metalloporphyrins, indicates that, although these asphaltene-bound vanadium compounds do not exhibit the characteristic UV/visible absorption, they are indeed still bound in a porphyrinic structure. The fact that the majority of the vanadium is contained within the highly aromatic, highly polar asphaltene fraction also poses additional roadblocks to their selective removal. This fraction has been shown to associate/aggregate significantly in most (if not all) solvents. Recent work on the nature and possible mechanisms of the molecular association of asphaltenes in solution can be extended to help elucidate the molecular interactions occurring between asphaltenes and metalloporphyrins, and hence the nature of the inclusion of metalloporphyrins within the asphaltene fraction. Many different solvent systems including aromatics, chloro-carbons, alcohols, ketones, as well as other polar solvents have been used to extract the metalloporphyrins from the asphaltene fraction with limited success. In most cases, the effect of asphaltene solubility and aggregation in the given solvent were not considered. The selective separation of metalloporphyrins is clearly hampered by gaps in the basic understanding of the metalloporphyrin properties and behavior in solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it