MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994956060 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.174302

Raman study of twin-free ortho-II<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>YBa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cu</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>single crystals

2008· article· lv· W1994956060 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. N. Iliev, Viktor G. Hadjiev, S. Jandl, D. Le Boeuf, V. N. Popov, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2008
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Air ForceUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Houston
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyPhysicsRaman scatteringPhononPseudogapCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceSuperconductivityOpticsChemistryCuprate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The polarized Raman scattering spectra from freshly cleaved $ab$, $ac$, and $bc$ surfaces of high quality twin-free ${\text{YBa}}_{2}{\text{Cu}}_{3}{\text{O}}_{6.5}$ (ortho-II) single crystals (${T}_{c}=57.5\text{ }\text{K}$ and $\ensuremath{\Delta}T=0.6\text{ }\text{K}$) were studied between 80 and 300 K. All 11 ${A}_{g}$ Raman modes expected for the ortho-II structure as well as some modes of ${B}_{2g}$ and ${B}_{3g}$ symmetries were identified in close comparison to predictions of lattice dynamical calculations. The electronic scattering from the $ab$ planes is strongly anisotropic and decreases between 200 and 100 K within the temperature range of a previously reported pseudogap opening. The coupling of phonons to Raman active electronic excitations manifested by asymmetric (Fano) profiles of several modes also decreases within the same range. Among the findings that distinguish the Raman scattering of the ortho-II phase from that of the ortho-I phase is the unusual relationship $({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{xx}\ensuremath{\approx}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{yy})$ between the elements of the Raman tensor of the apex oxygen ${A}_{g}$ mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207