MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994983733 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.391

La doble dimensión trágica de Barrie y Peter Pan

2011· article· es· W1994983733 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alfonso Muñoz Corcuera

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La plus grande partie des livres de James Matthew Barrie, dont en particulier Peter Pan explorent le rapport entre le monde des adultes et celui des enfants, avec une place d’honneur réservée à la mort car seuls les enfants morts (comme son frère aîné David) peuvent rester jeunes pour toujours. Cet article examine les mécanismes à travers lesquels Barrie a utilisé la littérature pour explorer ses rapports complexes avec l’univers enfantin duquel, comme nous tous, il a été un jour expulsé. Nous verrons comment son exil traumatisant du monde de l’enfance l’a empêché à tout jamais d’habiter normalement le monde des adultes. En même temps nous examinerons le problème contraire dont souffre le personnage de Peter Pan: celui d’être pris au piège d’une enfance éternelle, et d’être par conséquent privé des plaisirs de l’âge adulte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207