MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994999608 · doi:10.2350/14-11-1567-cr.1

Pleura Nodosum: Fetal Squamous Debris in an Unusual Location

2014· article· en· W1994999608 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Kocovski, Nina Stein, Jorge Arredondo

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOligohydramniosMedicineBronchopulmonary sequestrationFetusPathologyPulmonary sequestrationPleural effusionAmnionLungPregnancyRadiologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a pathologic-radiologic case of a fetus with a right extralobar bronchopulmonary sequestration that required intervention in the form of a thoraco-amniotic shunt for management of a right pleural effusion. The intervention was successful in reducing the pleural effusion and the infant was born at 39 weeks gestational age but required some respiratory support for the 1st day of life. The pulmonary sequestration was excised on day 7 of life and demonstrated several small nodules on its pleural surface. Histologic examination demonstrated that the nodules consisted of granulomatous plaques containing squamous epithelium and hairs. The nodules are similar to those described in amnion nodosum, when the amniotic membrane incorporates fetal skin within the superficial tissue layers of the placenta in cases of oligohydramnios. To our knowledge, this is the 1st reported case of nodules containing amniotic fetal squamous debris to occur on lung visceral pleura.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207