Cell cycle control by <i>daf‐21/Hsp90</i> at the first meiotic prophase/metaphase boundary during oogenesis in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DAF-21, a Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of Hsp90, is expressed primarily in germline cells. Although mutations in the daf-21 gene affect animal fertility, its cellular roles have remained elusive. To phenocopy daf-21 mutations, we impaired the daf-21 function by RNA interference (RNAi), and found that oocytes skipped the diakinesis arrest and displayed a defective diakinesis arrest, which led to the production of endomitotic oocytes with polyploid chromosomes (Emo phenotype). The same Emo phenotype was also observed with RNAi against wee-1.3. To identify a cause for Emo, we examined the CDK-1 (Cdc2) phosphorylation status in Emo animals, since CDK-1 is a key regulator of the prophase/metaphase transition and is kept inactivated by WEE-1.3 kinase during prophase. We immunostained both daf-21(RNAi) and wee-1.3(RNAi) animals with anti-phosphorylated-CDK-1 antibody and observed no detectable phosphates on CDK-1 in either of the animals. We also examined WEE-1.3 expression in daf-21(RNAi) and found a significant reduction of WEE-1.3. These results indicate that CDK-1 was not phosphorylated in either daf-21(RNAi) or wee-1.3(RNAi) animals, and suggest that daf-21 was necessary for producing functional WEE-1.3. Thus, all together, we propose that DAF-21 indirectly regulates the meiotic prophase/metaphase transition during oocyte development by ensuring the normal function of WEE-1.3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".