MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995021171 · doi:10.1080/07362990600869969

Almost Sure lim sup Behavior of Dependent Bootstrap Means

2006· article· en· W1995021171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueStochastic Analysis and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Approximation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsErgodic theoryLogarithmConvergence (economics)Mathematical economicsCombinatoricsWork (physics)Rate of convergenceCalculus (dental)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisEconomicsKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, the upper bound for the exact convergence rate (i.e., the law of the logarithm type result) is obtained for dependent bootstrap means. Keywords: Bootstrap meansDependent bootstrapKolmogorov exponential inequalityLaw of the logarithmPairwise i.i.d. sequencesStationary ergodic sequencesMathematics Subject Classification: Primary 62E20, 62G05Secondary 60F15 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work of A. Volodin is supported by a grant from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The work of M. Ordóñez Cabrera is supported by grants BFM 2000-0344-C0201 and FQM 127. The work of T.-C. Hu is supported by the grant NSC91-2118-M-007-008. The authors are exceptionally grateful to the referee for offering helpful remarks and comments that improved presentation of the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it