MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995037966 · doi:10.1142/s0218863510005157

COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRAFAST GAIN AND PHASE DYNAMICS IN SEMICONDUCTOR OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS

2010· article· en· W1995037966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & Materials · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrashort pulseSemiclassical physicsWavelengthSpectral hole burningOptical amplifierMaterials scienceAmplifierPhase (matter)SemiconductorOpticsSemiconductor laser theoryPhysicsOptoelectronicsLaserQuantumQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ultrafast dynamics of gain and phase in bulk semiconductor optical amplifiers are numerically investigated over a broad band of about 200 nm based on the semiclassical method of density matrix equations. The gain dynamics and phase dynamics are compared in four different bands for 200 fs Gaussian pump pulse. It is predicted that the recovery time of phase may be longer or shorter than that of gain depending on probe wavelengths. Furthermore, phase recovery overshoot may appear at wavelengths shorter than the pump wavelength. These interesting features result from the competition between spectral-hole burning and carrier heating over the whole band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it