Landau model for the elastic properties of the ferroelastic crystal Rb<sub>4</sub>LiH<sub>3</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using sound velocity measurements, we report a detailed investigation of the elastic properties of Rb(4)LiH(3)(SO(4))(4) realized as a function of temperature and pressure. Results are compared to predictions of a phenomenological Landau model. Supported by recent Raman scattering measurements, we assume that the [Formula: see text] structural transformation observed at T(c) = 134 K corresponds to a pseudo-proper ferroelastic transition. For the numerical analysis, all coupling parameters are determined using the temperature dependence of the frequency of the soft optical B mode, the temperature dependence of spontaneous strains, and the pressure dependence dT(c)/dP = 191 ± 2 K GPa(-1) also determined in this work. Our comparison indicates that the [Formula: see text] structural transition in Rb(4)LiH(3)(SO(4))(4) is fully consistent with predictions derived using our pseudo-proper ferroelastic model. Thus, all data presented in this paper corroborate that the mechanism leading to the structural transition at T(c) = 134 K results from the softening of the B optical mode observed at 31 cm(-1). This detailed analysis also refutes the idea that Rb(4)LiH(3)(SO(4))(4) shows incomplete softening of the soft acoustic mode also associated with that structural transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".