Pathogenicity of <i>Fusarium</i> Species on Different Plant Parts of Spring Wheat Under Controlled Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of the Fusarium species responsible for Fusarium head blight of wheat in Saskatchewan, Canada, have also been isolated from discolored subcrown internodes/crowns of wheat. It was therefore of interest to compare the susceptibility of heads and ground/underground tissue of wheat to isolates of Fusarium species from different sources. Controlled-environment pathogenicity tests were conducted on heads, seeds, and seedlings of spring wheat. Overall, F. culmorum and F. graminearum were the most pathogenic species, although the former was more pathogenic than the latter. F. equiseti and F. poae were the least pathogenic species, whereas F. avenaceum had intermediate pathogenicity in the head and seed tests, but low pathogenicity in the seedling test. There was a similar pathogenicity among isolates of each Fusarium species from different sources to heads and ground/underground plant parts, indicating a lack of adaptation of these isolates. Our observations suggest that Fusarium inoculum on or in infected seed or plant debris might infect plants at or below soil level, which could then become a source of inoculum for infection of heads in the following season(s). Survival of fungal inoculum in underground plant parts might be important during dry conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".