MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995118026 · doi:10.1109/icip.2012.6467449

Simulation analysis of sea surface current extraction from microwave nautical radar images

2012· article· en· W1995118026 on OpenAlexaff
Weimin Huang, Eric W. Gill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarRadar imagingRemote sensingContinuous-wave radarGeologyComputer scienceOcean currentAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an improved algorithm for extracting sea surface currents from X-band nautical radar image sequences is presented. The marine radar images are simulated by first numerically generating current-included ocean surface elevation maps for given sea states and radar parameters. Then the plan position indicator (PPI) radar images are produced via tilt and shadowing modulation processing. From the simulated radar images, current velocity is derived with a modified iterative least square (LS) fitting method in which higher harmonic wave components and aliasing effects are considered. Here, the correct current velocity is found by a proposed iteration-terminating criterion instead of using a fixed number of iterations. Simulated inversion results for a variety of current velocities and sea states validate the algorithm and show that the number of iterations may be reduced while obtaining highly precise measurement. The performance of the algorithm is also tested using real vertically polarized radar data through comparison with the results from other current methods and an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207