Long Transcripts from Dinoflagellate Chloroplast Minicircles Suggest “Rolling Circle” Transcription
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chloroplast genome of a dinoflagellate consists of a group of small circular DNA molecules (minicircles), most of which carry a single gene. With RT-PCR, primer extension, and Northern analyses, we show that the entire minicircle is transcribed and that some minicircles can produce RNAs larger than themselves. Using an RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends method, we were able to detect large processed precursors that are generated by endonucleolytic cleavage of an even longer molecule. This cleavage produces the mature mRNA 3'-end and at the same time the 5'-end of the precursor. The tRNAs encoded by the petD and psbE minicircles appear to be processed in the same way. We propose a "rolling circle" model for chloroplast transcription in which transcription would proceed continuously around the minicircular DNA to produce transcripts larger than the minicircle itself. These transcripts would be further processed into discrete mature mRNAs and tRNAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".