MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995142679 · doi:10.1121/1.3001705

Analysis of frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient in cancellous bone

2008· article· en· W1995142679 on OpenAlexafffund
Dean Ta, Weiqi Wang, Kai Huang, Yuanyuan Wang, Lawrence H. Le

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersShanghai Leading Academic Discipline ProjectHealth CanadaShanghai Rising-Star ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCancellous boneMaterials scienceUltrasonic sensorBackscatter (email)ScatteringFrequency dependenceCorrelation coefficientAttenuation coefficientBone mineralBiomedical engineeringAcousticsOpticsOsteoporosisNuclear magnetic resonanceMathematicsMedicinePhysicsStatisticsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ultrasonic scattering mechanism in cancellous bone is investigated theoretically and a model describing the frequency dependence of ultrasonic scattering from cancellous bone is presented. The ultrasonic backscatter coefficient (BSC) of bovine tibiae, human calcanei in vitro and in vivo, were measured and discussed. The data of BSC were also fitted by polynomial. The results demonstrate that BSC is a nonlinear function of frequency and increases with frequency. A good agreement was obtained between BSC values from theory and experiment. Also, the high correlation coefficient between BSC and bone mineral density was obtained, r=0.85+/-0.07 (mean+/-SD) (n=15, p<0.001). Based on the values of BSC, the status of cancellous bone and the degree of osteoporotic fracture risk may be assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207