MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fístula quilosa tras linfadenectomía axilar en cáncer de mama

2014· article· es· W1995151294 on OpenAlexaff
A. Rico Arrastia, F. Vicente García, F Omeñaca, C. Artieda Soto, M.A. Sanz de Pablo, F. Domínguez Cunchillos

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVictoria General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAxillary Lymph Node DissectionBreast cancerLymph nodeDissection (medical)Axillary DissectionAxillaSurgeryBreast surgeryCancerMastectomySentinel lymph nodeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Axillary lymph node dissection remains an integral part of surgical treatment in patients with invasive breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastases. Chylous leakage after axillary lymph node dissection is infrequent. We report the case of a patient with an advanced local breast cancer that was subsidiary to surgery treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. She had a postoperative chylous leakage; it was successfully treated conservatively in the postoperative course. Chylous leakage an infrequent complication alters axillary lymph node dissection, which has a conservative management in most published studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales del Sistema Sanitario de NavarraSame topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207