MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995173495 · doi:10.1002/app.25163

Solubility measurements of N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in polypropylene and ethene/octene copolymer

2006· article· en· W1995173495 on OpenAlexaff
Li Guo, Felix Gunkel, J. Wang, Chul B. Park, Volker Altstädt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerPolypropyleneSolubilityOctenePolymerPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceContext (archaeology)Volume (thermodynamics)ThermodynamicsChemistryPhysical chemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this set of experiments a magnetic suspension balance (MSB) was employed to measure the apparent solubilities of N2 and CO2 in polypropylene (PP) and ethene/octene copolymer melts, while the swollen volume predicted by the Sanchez–Lacombe (SL) equation of state (EOS) was used to account for the buoyancy effect. The swollen volume of the polymer/gas mixture, as well as the gas solubilities for both PP and the ethene/octene copolymer, are discussed. It was observed that the branched molecular structure limited the molecular movement, and therefore the volume swelling of the polymer/gas mixture. In a similar context, the solubility of both N2 and CO2 were less in the branched polymer (ethene/octene copolymer) than in the linear PP. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 2945–2953, 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer Foaming and CompositesFrench-language works237,207