MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995176042 · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02302-6

Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature

2002· article· en· W1995176042 on OpenAlexaff
MAPK Group, K. Ichimura, Kazuo Shinozaki, Guillaume Tena, Jen Sheen, Yves Henry, M. Kreis, Shuqun Zhang, Heribert Hirt, Cathal Wilson, Erwin Heberle‐Bors, Brian E. Ellis, Peter C. Morris, Roger W. Innes, Joseph R. Ecker, Dierk Scheel, Daniel F. Klessig, Yasunori Machida, John Mundy, Yuko Ohashi, John C. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Plant Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyKinaseArabidopsisMAPK/ERK pathwayMAPK cascadeMitogen-activated protein kinaseCell biologyProtein kinase ASignal transductionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,295
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207