Contribution de la coopération, de l’économie sociale et des entreprises collectives dans le développement territorial des Îles Lamèque et Miscou en Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La contribution de l’économie sociale, de la coopération et de l’intercoopération a marqué le territoire insulaire de Lamèque-Miscou depuis les années 1930 et 1940. La présente étude met en perspective l’intercoopération entre les coopératives de pêche, de consommation et de services financiers pour favoriser de nouvelles entreprises collectives. C’est au moyen de l’analyse des rapports annuels, d’entrevues semi-dirigées et de validation par groupe de discussion que nous avons mené cette recherche. Nous montrons que la mobilisation des coopératives en partenariat avec les municipalités et diverses agences gouvernementales a permis l’investissement en ressources monétaires et en capital humain dans des domaines aussi variés que l’habitation, les arts et la culture, les loisirs, l’énergie renouvelable et l’environnement. Il en ressort une capacité de résilience des entreprises collectives et une contribution remarquable au développement territorial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".