Metal-free dehydrogenation of amine–boranes by an N-heterocyclic carbene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dehydrogenation of primary and secondary amine-boranes (RNH(2)·BH(3) and R(2)NH·BH(3); R = alkyl groups) was studied using the bulky N-heterocyclic carbene IPr (IPr = [(HCNDipp)C:]; Dipp = 2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3)) as a stoichiometric dehydrogenation agent. In the case of primary amine-boranes, carbene-bound adducts IPr·BH(2)-NH(R)-BH(3) were obtained in place of the desired polymers [RNH-BH(2)](n). The secondary amine-borane (i)Pr(2)NH·BH(3) participated in dehydrogenation chemistry with IPr to afford the aminoborane [(i)Pr(2)N=BH(2)] and the dihydroaminal IPrH(2) as products. Attempts to induce H(2) elimination from the arylamine-borane DippNH(2)·BH(3) yielded a reaction mixture containing the known species IPr·BH(2)NHDipp, IPr·BH(2)NH(Dipp)-BH(3), free DippNH(2) and IPrH(2). The new hindered aryl-amine borane adduct Ar*NH(2)·BH(3) [Ar* = 2,6-(Ph(2)CH)(2)-4-MeC(6)H(2)] underwent a reaction with IPr to give IPr·BH(3) and free Ar*NH(2), consistent with the presence of a weaker N-B dative bond in Ar*NH(2)·BH(3) relative to its less hindered amine-borane analogues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".