MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995220443 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318170a9ce

Effects of leukoreduced blood on acute lung injury after trauma: A randomized controlled trial*

2008· article· en· W1995220443 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy R. Watkins, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Thomas R. Martin, Theresa Nester, Ellen Caldwell, Jens Billgren, John Ruzinski, Avery B. Nathens

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineLeukoreductionRelative riskRandomized controlled trialRespiratory distressAnesthesiaDiffuse alveolar damageBlood transfusionARDSInjury Severity ScoreMechanical ventilationTransfusion-related acute lung injuryConfidence intervalInternal medicineLungAcute respiratory distressPoison controlPulmonary edemaEmergency medicineInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The requirement for a blood transfusion after trauma is associated with an increased risk of acute lung injury. Residual leukocytes contaminating red cells are potential mediators of this syndrome. The goal of this trial was to test our hypothesis that prestorage leukoreduction of blood would reduce rates of posttraumatic lung injury. DESIGN: Double blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University-affiliated level I trauma center in King County, Seattle, WA. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-eight injured patients requiring red blood cell transfusion within 24 hrs of injury. INTERVENTIONS: Prestorage leukoreduced vs. standard allogeneic blood transfusions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared the incidence of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome at early (< or = 72 hrs) and late (> 72 hrs) time points after injury. In a subset, we compared plasma levels of surfactant protein-D and von Willebrand factor antigen between intervention arms. Rates of acute lung injury (relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] .69-1.640) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR .96, 95% CI 0.48-1.91) were not statistically different between intervention arms early after injury. Similarly, no statistically significant effect of leukoreduced transfusion on rates of acute lung injury (RR .88, 95% CI .54-1.44) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR .95, 95% CI .58-1.57) was observed to occur late after injury. There was no significant difference in the number of ventilator-free days or in other ventilator parameters between intervention arms. No statistically significant effect of leukoreduced blood on plasma levels of surfactant protein-D or von Willebrand factor antigen was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Prestorage leukoreduction had no effect on the incidence or timing of lung injury or on plasma measures of systemic alveolar and endothelial inflammation in a population of trauma patients requiring transfusion. The relationship between transfusion and lung injury is not obviously explained by mechanistic pathways involving the presence of transfused leukocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207