Effects of leukoreduced blood on acute lung injury after trauma: A randomized controlled trial*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The requirement for a blood transfusion after trauma is associated with an increased risk of acute lung injury. Residual leukocytes contaminating red cells are potential mediators of this syndrome. The goal of this trial was to test our hypothesis that prestorage leukoreduction of blood would reduce rates of posttraumatic lung injury. DESIGN: Double blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University-affiliated level I trauma center in King County, Seattle, WA. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-eight injured patients requiring red blood cell transfusion within 24 hrs of injury. INTERVENTIONS: Prestorage leukoreduced vs. standard allogeneic blood transfusions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared the incidence of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome at early (< or = 72 hrs) and late (> 72 hrs) time points after injury. In a subset, we compared plasma levels of surfactant protein-D and von Willebrand factor antigen between intervention arms. Rates of acute lung injury (relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] .69-1.640) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR .96, 95% CI 0.48-1.91) were not statistically different between intervention arms early after injury. Similarly, no statistically significant effect of leukoreduced transfusion on rates of acute lung injury (RR .88, 95% CI .54-1.44) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR .95, 95% CI .58-1.57) was observed to occur late after injury. There was no significant difference in the number of ventilator-free days or in other ventilator parameters between intervention arms. No statistically significant effect of leukoreduced blood on plasma levels of surfactant protein-D or von Willebrand factor antigen was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Prestorage leukoreduction had no effect on the incidence or timing of lung injury or on plasma measures of systemic alveolar and endothelial inflammation in a population of trauma patients requiring transfusion. The relationship between transfusion and lung injury is not obviously explained by mechanistic pathways involving the presence of transfused leukocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".