Solvent Effect on the α-Effect for the Reactions of Aryl Acetates with Butane-2,3-dione Monoximate and <i>p</i>-Chlorophenoxide in MeCN−H<sub>2</sub>O Mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Second-order rate constants have been measured spectrophotometrically for the nucleophilic reactions of three substituted phenyl acetates with butane-2,3-dione monoximate (Ox(-)) as an alpha-nucleophile and p-chlorophenoxide (ClPhO(-)) as corresponding normal nucleophile, in MeCN-H2O mixtures of varying compositions at 25.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C. The reactivity of Ox(-) toward the aryl acetates decreases upon addition of MeCN to the reaction medium up to ca. 30 mol % MeCN, followed by a gradual increase in rate upon further addition of MeCN. A similar result has been obtained for the reaction of ClPhO(-) with the aryl acetates. However, the decrease in rate is more significant for the less reactive ClPhO(-) than for the more reactive Ox(-). Thus, for all the aryl acetates studied, Ox(-) exhibits a sizable alpha-effect (k(Ox)-/k(ClPhO)-) whose magnitude increases as the mol % MeCN in the reaction medium increases. The relative basicities (DeltapK(a)) of Ox(-) and ClPhO(-) have been determined spectrophotometrically using piperazine as a reference base. The DeltapK(a) values increase on increasing the mol % MeCN in the medium for both Ox(-) and ClPhO(-). The difference in the relative basicities of these nucleophiles (DeltaDeltapK(a)) becomes larger with increasing mol % MeCN. The plots of log k(Ox)-/k(ClPhO)- vs DeltaDeltapK(a) for the three substrates are linear with near-unit slope, indicating that the difference in the relative basicity of the nucleophiles is largely responsible for the increasing alpha-effect with medium composition in this system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".