Procureur c. X : les enseignements à tirer de la poursuite des enfants soldats pour crimes contre l’humanité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peut-on tenir pénalement responsables les enfants soldats auteurs de crimes internationaux ? La question mérite d’être posée dans la mesure où bien que le droit international pénal ait mis en place des mécanismes pour poursuivre, condamner et punir ceux qui se rendent coupables de violations du droit international, ces mécanismes ne sauraient être appliqués sans distinction d’âge. C’est cette problématique de la poursuite et de la condamnation des enfants soldats qui constitue la trame de fond de cet article. L’auteur y aborde la question sous le prisme d’une décision de justice, Procureur c. X, rendue en 2002 par l’une des chambres spéciales pour les crimes graves commis au Timor-Leste (ou Timor-Oriental). L’auteur soutient que cette affaire représente un recul inquiétant pour le droit international, car l’enfant ne bénéficie d’aucune mesure conçue explicitement pour lui devant ce tribunal international « hybride », bien que l’élaboration d’une justice pénale juvénile soit un acquis en droit interne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".