Les marchés publics : étude des obligations internationales du Canada, du GATT à l'ALENA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but premier du présent article est de fournir au lecteur une analyse détaillée et critique du chapitre 10 de l'ALENA qui traite des marchés publics. Le texte constitue aussi une introduction aux obligations internationales du Canada en matière de marchés publics puisqu'il en rappelle les sources et les concepts de base. Aussi l'auteure commente-t-elle, dans sa première partie, le Code sur les marchés publics du GATT de 1979, tout en demeurant critique quant à son influence au Canada. Par la même occasion, elle met en relief les dispositions intéressantes du nouveau Code du GATT sur les marchés publics adopté à l'issue des négociations de l'Uruguay Round, en décembre 1993. Le chapitre 13 de l’ALE est lui aussi abordé par l'auteure; cependant, dans ce cas, c'est surtout la tribune de contestation des marchés qui a retenu son attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".