MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995260192 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/16/1/008

Modulation of the photoluminescence spectrum by depth selective excitation of an embedded Si-nc layer

2004· article· en· W1995260192 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Smirani, F. Martín, G. Abel, Y Q Wang, J.R.H. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhotoluminescenceRefractive indexLaserOpticsAmorphous solidSpectral lineOptoelectronicsSiliconAmorphous siliconSubstrate (aquarium)EllipsometryThin filmCrystalline siliconNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon nanocrystals (Si-nc) were produced by the implantation of Si+ in excess into amorphous quartz and a 1 µm SiO2 film thermally grown on an Si substrate. In the latter, the photoluminescence (PL) spectra from the Si-nc, induced by Ar+ laser excitation, are modulated by Fabry–Perot type interference fringes due to the interference of the emitted light reflected at the Si/SiO2 interface with that propagating directly towards the surface. In this paper, we investigate the spectral modulation and the PL as a function of the incidence angle of the pump laser and the Si+ dose implantation. The modulation of the PL spectra is influenced by the distribution in depth of the pump laser intensity in the SiO2 layer, the depth distribution of the Si-nc and the refractive index distribution of the layered structures. One goal of our work is to modulate the emission spectra by acting on the thickness of the SiO2 layer. Simulations have been undertaken to establish a relation between the modulation of the PL spectrum and the depth distribution of both the pump laser intensity and the Si-nc. This study required the precise measurements of the depth distribution of both the complex refractive index (n,k) by ellipsometry and the Si-nc by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnologySame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207