MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vertical Economies and the Structure of U.S. Hog Farms

2007· article· en· W1995261388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Azzeddine Azzam, Cari S. Skinner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseconomies of scaleEconomies of scaleEconomyEconomies of scopeWelfare economicsProduction (economics)EconomicsAgricultural scienceMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scale economies are often touted as the factor behind the trend in the structure of the U.S. hog industry toward fewer and larger hog farms. However, since hog production is multistage and farms either integrate or separate the stages, the appropriate measures are multistage economies. In theory, a smaller and, presumably, high‐cost operation, by the standards of single stage/output scale economies, may still be cost‐competitive if it enjoys multistage economies — that is if vertical scope economies more than offset stage‐specific scale diseconomies. Whether that holds in practice remains heretofore unexplored in the agricultural economics literature. Using a unique data set on hog farms in the U.S. Midwest, we estimate a multistage cost function and provide the first‐ever estimates of multistage economies, stage‐specific economies, and vertical scope economies in hog production. Les économies d'échelle sont souvent soupçonnées d'être le facteur qui influence la tendance observée dans la structure de l'industrie porcine aux États‐Unis, soit des porcheries moins nombreuses mais de plus grande taille. Cependant, comme la production porcine est une production à plusieurs stades et que les producteurs peuvent choisir d'intégrer ces stades ou d'exploiter un seul stade, les mesures appropriées sont les économies d'échelle liées aux stades multiples. En théorie, une petite porcherie, qui a probablement des coûts élevés selon les critères des économies d'échelle liées à un seul stade, peut tout de même être concurrentielle quant aux coûts si elle profite des économies d'échelle liées aux stades multiples, c'est‐à‐dire si les économies de gamme verticales font plus que compenser les déséconomies d'échelle liées à un seul stade. La vérification de cette théorie dans la pratique demeure, jusqu'ici, inexploitée dans la littérature agroéconomique. En utilisant un ensemble de données sur des porcheries situées dans le Midwest américain, nous avons estimé une fonction de coût lié aux stades multiples et nous présentons les premières estimations d'économies d'échelle liées aux stades multiples, d'économies d'échelle liées à un seul stade et d'économies de gamme verticales dans la production porcine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomieSame topicEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFrench-language works237,207