MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995264010 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.775

1165 TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS IN A MULTI-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE ADVANCE MALE SLING SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF POST-PROSTATECTOMY STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

2011· article· en· W1995264010 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Kennelly, Kurt McCammon, L. Dean Knoll, LeRoy Jones, Gregory T. Bales, Sender Herschorn, Brian W. Roberts, Timothy B. Boone, George D. Webster

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Medical Systems
KeywordsMedicineUrinary incontinenceProstatectomySling (weapon)Stress incontinenceGeneral surgeryProspective cohort studyUrologyGynecologySurgeryInternal medicineProstate cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Incontinence - Evaluation & Therapy1 Apr 20111165 TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS IN A MULTI-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE ADVANCE MALE SLING SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF POST-PROSTATECTOMY STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE Michael J. Kennelly, Kurt A. McCammon, L. Dean Knoll, LeRoy A. Jones, Gregory T. Bales, Sender Herschorn, Brian Roberts, Timothy B. Boone, and George D. Webster Michael J. KennellyMichael J. Kennelly Charlotte, NC More articles by this author , Kurt A. McCammonKurt A. McCammon Norfolk, VA More articles by this author , L. Dean KnollL. Dean Knoll Nashville, TN More articles by this author , LeRoy A. JonesLeRoy A. Jones San Antonio, TX More articles by this author , Gregory T. BalesGregory T. Bales Chicago, IL More articles by this author , Sender HerschornSender Herschorn Toronto, Canada More articles by this author , Brian RobertsBrian Roberts Myrtle Beach, SC More articles by this author , Timothy B. BooneTimothy B. Boone Houston, TX More articles by this author , and George D. WebsterGeorge D. Webster Durham, NC More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.775AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We report on 2-year clinical results from a North American study using the AdVance® transobturator male sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). METHODS A multi-center, prospective study was conducted at 10 centers. Men ≥40 years of age with PPI of at least 6 months duration were eligible for the IRB approved study. Pad weights (1-hour and 24-hour) and pads used per day were assessed pre-operatively and at follow-up. Improvement in quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by 3 QOL questionnaires. Follow-up occurred at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complete baseline and follow-up data could not be collected for all patients. Therefore, in addition to comparison of baseline results to 12-and 24-month follow-up results, the data were also analyzed with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) for those with follow-up results, and a worst case scenario (WCS) analysis defined as LOCF including the baseline results being used as the 24-month result. RESULTS Between February 2006 and April 2007, 49 men with PPI were implanted with the AdVance sling. Mean age was 64.5 years. Results show a highly significant pad weight test improvement for all analyses. In addition, pads per day results showed that ∼70% of patients used 0–1 pads per day at 12 and 24-months. QOL scores also showed significant improvement at both 12 and 24-months. There were no instances of long term retention, urethral erosion, or urethral or bladder perforation. Results show that lower pad usage at baseline increased the likelihood of postoperative success. Also, post-hoc analysis of 24-hour pad weight data did show that patients with lower baseline 24-hour pad weights were more likely to use 0–1 pads per day at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS This two-year multi-center, prospective study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of the transobturator sling in the treatment of mild to moderate PPI. Continence rates improved and were maintained through 24-month follow-up. This minimally-invasive sling carries a low incidence of adverse events yet maintains high QOL improvements. Proper patient selection and surgical technique refinement noted during this study will likely further enhance patient outcomes. Results Summary Baseline 12-Month 24-Month LOCF WCS Mean 1-Hour Pad Weight Test (grams) 78.4(n=48) 15.8⁎(n=33 21.0⁎(n=29) 22.2⁎(n=41) 30.5⁎(n=48) Mean 24-Hour Pad Weight Test(grams) 377.2(n=48) 42.0⁎(n=31) 38.3⁎(n=28) 73.0⁎(n=42) 110.0⁎(n=48) Patients Using 0-1 Pads/Day 14.3%(7/49) 70.3%⁎⁎(26/37) 67.7%⁎⁎(21/30) 51.0%⁎⁎(25/49) 51.0%⁎⁎(25/49) IQOL̂ 50.3(n=49) 79.9⁎⁎⁎(n=35) 82.4⁎⁎⁎(n=31) NA NA ICIQ-SF̂̂ 15.7(n=49) 7.3⁎⁎⁎(n=35) 7.5⁎⁎⁎(n=31) NA NA UCLA/RAND̂̂̂ 20.1(n=49) 57.4⁎⁎⁎(n=35) 57.3⁎⁎⁎(n=31) NA NA ⁎ Signed rank (P< 0.0001) for improvement compared to baseline ⁎⁎ McNemar (P< 0.0002) for improvement compared to baseline Încontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire, urinary function score ̂Înternational Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form ̂̂ÛCLA Prostate Cancer Index Short Form (UCLA-PCA-SF) including the RAND 12-item Health Survey v2 (SF-12 v2) ⁎⁎⁎ T-test (P< 0.0001) for improvement compared to baseline © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e467-e468 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael J. Kennelly Charlotte, NC More articles by this author Kurt A. McCammon Norfolk, VA More articles by this author L. Dean Knoll Nashville, TN More articles by this author LeRoy A. Jones San Antonio, TX More articles by this author Gregory T. Bales Chicago, IL More articles by this author Sender Herschorn Toronto, Canada More articles by this author Brian Roberts Myrtle Beach, SC More articles by this author Timothy B. Boone Houston, TX More articles by this author George D. Webster Durham, NC More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207