MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pure Severe Dyslexia After a Perinatal Focal Lesion: Evidence of a Specific Module for Acquisition of Reading

2002· article· en· W1995280173 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Daigneault, Claude M. J. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDyslexiaPsychologyLesionReading (process)CognitionAudiologyDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceMedicineLinguisticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A child with a small, residual "localized" perinatally acquired left hemisphere temporal tip lesion is described. He presents with pure and severe dyslexia and average to high-average cognitive skills, which are usually in the low-average range in patients with developmental dyslexia. A highly circumscribed deficit of rote auditory verbal memory was the only deficit other than the dyslexia; his verbal semantic memory and visuospatial memory were intact. Two previously reported cases present a similar functional profile and lesion locus. This profile indicates that there may exist, at birth, a localized neural network dedicated to "reading acquisition" and that the layout of this network may differ from the systems identified as defective in developmental dyslexia, as well as in cases of acquired dyslexia in adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsSame topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207