MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995286816 · doi:10.7901/2169-3358-2001-2-917

AIRBORNE OIL SPILL SENSOR TESTING: PROGRESS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

2001· article· en· W1995286816 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carl E. Brown, Richard Marois, Mervin F. Fingas, M. Choquet, Jean‐Pierre Monchalin, Joseph V. Mullin, R. H. Goodman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Oil Spill Conference Proceedings · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)National Research Council CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceLaserSystem of measurementOil spillMarine engineeringEngineeringGeologyEnvironmental engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT It is now possible to measure the thickness of an oil slick on water by remote sensing. A laboratory sensor has been developed to provide this absolute oil slick thickness measurement. A joint project between Environment Canada, U.S. Minerals Management Service (MMS), Imperial Oil Research Ltd., and Industrial Materials Institute of the National Research Council of Canada has led to the development of a prototype slick thickness measurement system, known as the Laser Ultrasonic Remote Sensing of Oil Thickness (LURSOT) sensor. This prototype was the first step in achieving the ultimate goal of providing an airborne sensor for the remote measurement of oil slick thickness on water. The LURSOT sensor employs three lasers to produce and measure the time-of-flight of ultrasonic waves in oil, hence providing a direct measurement of oil slick thickness. The successful application of this technology to the measurement of oil slick thickness will benefit (1) the scientific community as a whole by providing information about the dynamics of oil slick spreading and (2) the spill responder by providing a measurement of the effectiveness of spill countermeasures such as dispersant application. The first part of this paper provides initial results from laboratory testing prior to a second round of airborne test flights of the modified LURSOT system. The second part of this paper provides details on a new generation of laser fluorosensor, known as Scanning Laser Environmental Airborne Fluorosensor (SLEAF). SLEAF recently has been installed on Environment Canada's DCS aircraft. SLEAF incorporates a high-power excimer laser, high-resolution range-gated intensified diode-array spectrometer, and a pair of variable speed and angular displacement scanning mirrors. These scanning mirrors provide SLEAF with the across-track sampling pattern needed to detect narrow bands of oil that can pile up along the high tide lines of beaches and shorelines. Ground testing of SLEAF has now been underway for some time. This paper provides details of the sensor installation and testing program, and illustrates the operational capabilities of the new system. It is believed that this new sensor will provide prompt reliable detection and mapping of oil contamination in a variety of marine and terrestrial environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Oil Spill Conference ProceedingsSame topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207