MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995292063 · doi:10.1159/000162348

Cells Involved in the Immune Response

2008· article· en· W1995292063 on OpenAlexaff
R. Haasz, M. Richter

Bibliographic record

VenuePathologia et Microbiologia · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemAntigenImmunologyAntibody responseAntibodyBiologyHumoral immunityCellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normal outbred adult rabbits obtained from the same breeder at different times and from different breeders at the same time display a difference in their capacity to give a primary humoral immune response with respect to conventional antigens. This variation in response is characterized by marked differences, both in terms of sensitivity to the amount of antigen injected, and in terms of the resistance or susceptibility of the response to whole body irradiation. Thus, the humoral immune response may ensue through the participation of both the antigen-reactive cell and antibody-forming cell or through the mediation of the antibody-forming cell only. These 2 cell pathways can be differentiated on the basis of their sensitivity to irradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePathologia et MicrobiologiaSame topicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, HealthFrench-language works237,207