MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995314179 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2014.2316732

Staircase Codes With 6% to 33% Overhead

2014· article· en· W1995314179 on OpenAlexafffund
Lei M. Zhang, Frank R. Kschischang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoGovernment of OntarioCompute Canada
KeywordsDecoding methodsOverhead (engineering)Computer scienceCode (set theory)Coding (social sciences)Transmission (telecommunications)Coding gainAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We design staircase codes with overheads between 6.25% and 33.3% for high-speed optical transport networks. Using a reduced-complexity simulation of staircase coded transmission over the BSC, we select code candidates from within a limited parameter space. Software simulations of coded BSC transmission are performed with algebraic component code decoders. The net coding gain of the best code designs are competitive with the best known hard-decision decodable codes over the entire range of overheads. At 20% overhead, staircase codes are within 0.92 dB of BSC capacity at a bit error-rate of$10^{-15}$. Decoding complexity and latency of the new staircase codes are also significantly reduced from existing hard-decision decodable schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations240
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207