De l’exotisme à l’effet miroir : la représentation de l’histoire latino-américaine au Canada français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’histoire de l’Amérique latine a constitué une source d’inspiration pour plusieurs auteurs canadiens-français. La représentation de son histoire sociopolitique et culturelle ainsi que la vaillante résistance de certains gouvernements latino-américains contre l’impérialisme étatsunien et britannique ont trouvé un écho favorable au Canada français. Cette représentation, qui propose une sorte d’histoire connectée des peuples latins d’Amérique, a favorisé l’émergence d’un sentiment de solidarité pour les luttes anti-impérialistes latino-américaines bien avant la Révolution tranquille. Cet article retrace comment des auteurs comme Henri Bourassa, Antonio Dragon, Dostaler O’Leary et Lionel Groulx ont représenté l’histoire de l’Amérique latine, incitant leurs lecteurs à se familiariser avec les luttes de la région contre la domination économique des grands centres financiers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".