MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995403034 · doi:10.1080/01647950903524158

<i>Afroproterothrix</i>n. gen. of the feather mite subfamily Pterodectinae (Astigmata: Proctophyllodidae) from passerines (Aves: Passeriformes) in Africa

2010· article· en· W1995403034 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sergey V. Mironov, G. Wauthy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Acarology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaBiologySystematicsZoologyTaxonomy (biology)FeatherGenusSubfamily

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new feather mite genus and species Afroproterothrix marginata n. gen., n. sp. is described from the western black-headed oriole, Oriolus brachyrhynchus Swainson, 1837 (Passeriformes: Oriolidae), in Cameroon. The new genus belongs to the Proterothrix generic group and is most similar to the genus Nanopterodectes Mironov, Citation2009 by the loss of idiosomal setae d2, f2 and by having solenidia s1 and ?3 on legs I subequal in length. The genus Afroproterothrix differs from Nanopterodectes by the following combination of features: in both sexes, idiosomal setae c1 and trochanteral setae sRIII are absent, idiosomal setae e2 are present, the humeral shields on dorsal surface of the hysterosoma are not developed; in males, the opisthosomal lobes are poorly developed, the branches of the genital arch are well developed; in females, the hysteronotal shield is not divided into anterior and lobar parts. Brief comments on the systematics of the subfamily Pterodectinae are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AcarologySame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207