MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995433223 · doi:10.1002/rnc.1482

2‐DOF discrete‐time nonlinear ℋ<sub>∞</sub>‐filters

2009· article· en· W1995433223 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemMathematicsFilter (signal processing)Linear filterImpulse responseImpulse (physics)Class (philosophy)Nonlinear filterApplied mathematicsFilter designMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a new theory of two‐degrees‐of‐freedom (2‐DOF)‐ℋ︁ ∞ and certainty‐equivalent filters is presented. Exact and approximate solutions to the nonlinear ℋ︁ ∞ filtering problem using this class of filters are derived in terms of discrete‐time Hamilton–Jacobi–Isaacs equations. The expressions for the filter gains are determined as functions of the filter state and the system's output in contrast to earlier results. Hence, it is shown that coupled with the additional degree‐of‐freedom, these filters are a substantial improvement over the earlier 1‐DOF case. The theory presented is also generalized to n ‐DOF filters, which bore strong connections to linear infinite‐impulse response filters and hence are generalizations of this class of filters to the nonlinear setting. Simulation results are also given to show the usefulness of the new approach. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it