MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995440699 · doi:10.1145/1815396.1815630

Packet level scheduling schemes for multi-user MIMO systems with beamforming

2010· article· en· W1995440699 on OpenAlexaff
Masoomeh Torabzadeh, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Network packetTelecommunications linkMIMOBeamformingComputer networkBit error rateTransmission delayNetwork schedulerProcessing delayReal-time computingRound-robin schedulingFair-share schedulingTelecommunicationsEngineeringQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the packet-level scheduling for the downlink of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) multi-user systems using beamforming. We consider the traffic arrival process and different packet lengths. We tackle low-complex practical implementation that provides low average packet transmission delay and bit error rates (BER) to users. We propose a work-conserving scheduling scheme that considers different users guarantees (heterogeneous users). We implement and compare different MIMO schedulers at the packet level. Simulations show the low average packet transmission delay and bit error rate of our proposed scheduler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207