Emotional and Relational Consequences of Coping in Stepfamilies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY One hundred and fifty-four remarried couples were interviewed at two time-points 20 months apart and provided ratings of closeness and tension in their relationships with both their own children and their stepchildren. The difference in emotional relationship quality for stepchildren and own children was described as the “stepgap.” Eighty-one of these couples also completed structured diaries daily for 1 week reporting on daily family stressors and ways of coping. Compromise, confrontation, and interpersonal withdrawal were examined as ways of coping with interpersonal stress. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze family data. Results suggest that in stepfamilies where wives use confrontation to cope with family stressors, husbands withdraw emotionally from stepchildren. When husbands withdraw consistently, emotional closeness between wives and stepchildren deteriorates, and tension between wives and their own children increases
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it