An experimental study of louvers for fish diversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experimental study of louvers that are used for diversion of fish from water intakes and canals. This investigation was conducted in two phases. Phase I involved the field testing of a louver with curved slats for the guidance of hatchery-reared juvenile rainbow trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss) for louver angles θ of 7.2° and 17.0°. Phase II was a laboratory study with flat slats placed perpendicular to the approaching flow with θ of 10.0° and 15.0°. The velocity in the bypass in terms of the approach velocity increased to 1.7 and 2.5, respectively, for the curved and flat louvers for a bypass width b equal to 5% of the width of the approach channel B. The discharge in the bypass channel Q b in terms of the discharge in the approach channel Q was 0.15 and 0.20 for b/B = 0.10 for the curved and flat louvers, respectively, and Q b /Q = 0.07 for b/B = 0.05 for both the curved and flat louver slats. Key words: fish diversion, louvers, canals, open channels, water intakes, turbulent flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".