MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995491561 · doi:10.5589/m08-063

Apport de la classification spectrale des compositions colorées des indices pour la cartographie des sols salins dans un milieu aride du Sud tunisien

2008· article· fr· W1995491561 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dalel Ouerchefani, Houcine Taâmallah, Abderrazek Belghith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCartographyRemote sensingVegetation IndexMultispectral pattern recognitionVegetation (pathology)ForestryMultispectral imageMathematicsGeologyNormalized Difference Vegetation Index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper treats an application concerning the use of spatial high resolution imagery (SPOT XS data) for mapping salt-affected soils in arid zones. The methodology adapted is based on the confrontation of data collected in the field and the classification of the spectral data. It is also based on the calculation and the use of soil and vegetation indices (brightness index (IB), colour index (IC)) as well as the spectral behaviour analysis of reference plots. These plots are used to perform a supervised classification of the colour composite of the mentioned indices. An error matrix is calculated for assessing the accuracy of results. According to this study, band combinations using XS3, brightness index, and colour index appear to be the most useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207