MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995493126 · doi:10.4236/jwarp.2015.74026

Predicting Hourly Stream Temperatures Using the Equilibrium Temperature Model

2015· article· en· W1995493126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Resource and Protection · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSnowmeltEnvironmental scienceAir temperatureThermodynamic equilibriumRiver ecosystemMean radiant temperatureHydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesSnowMeteorologyEcosystemClimate changeThermodynamicsEcologyPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water temperature is a key physical habitat determinant in lotic ecosystems as it influences many physical, chemical and biological properties of rivers. Hence, a good understanding of the thermal regime of rivers is essential for effective management of water and fisheries resources. This study deals with the modeling of hourly stream water temperature using the equilibrium temperature model. This water temperature model was applied on two thermally different watercourses, namely, the Little Southwest Miramichi River (LSWM) and Catamaran Brook (CatBk; New Brunswick). The equilibrium temperature model is a simplified version of a deterministic model. As such, in the equilibrium temperature model the total heat flux at the surface is assumed proportional to the difference between the water temperature and an equilibrium temperature. In the present study, the equilibrium temperature was assumed to vary linearly with hourly air temperature. This study showed that there was a good relationship between the equilibrium and air temperature at the hourly time scale. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) obtained with the hourly equilibrium temperature model was similar to results reported in previous studies with values of 1.05°C (CatBk) and 1.36°C (LSWM). The model’s performance was best in late summer and autumn when water levels were low. In contrast, the presence of snowmelt in the spring resulted in poorer performances. This study also showed good results in estimating the daily mean (Tmean) and maximum (Tmax) water temperatures from the predicted hourly water temperatures, which were often required in fishery management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it