MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endotoxin promotes adhesion of human erythrocytes to human vascular endothelial cells under conditions of flow

2000· article· en· W1995498415 on OpenAlexaff
Otto Eichelbrönner, Andreas W. Sielenkämper, Gediminas Cepinskas, William J. Sibbald, Ian Chin‐Yee

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncubationEndothelial stem cellEndotheliumAdhesionIn vitroMedicineCell adhesionMolecular biologyImmunologyBiologyChemistryBiochemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of endotoxin on adhesion of human red blood cells to human vascular endothelial cells under conditions of flow. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled in vitro study. SETTINGS: University-affiliated cell biology laboratory. SUBJECTS: Human erythrocytes and human vascular endothelial cells. INTERVENTIONS: Fresh human erythrocytes and human vascular endothelial cells grown as monolayers were incubated with either saline or endotoxin. After incubation, endothelial monolayers were superfused with erythrocytes, and the number of erythrocytes adhering to the endothelial monolayer was quantified. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Adhesion of erythrocytes to vascular endothelium was measured under conditions of continuous flow in different settings: a) exposure of both endothelial cells and erythrocytes to saline; b) incubation of both erythrocytes and endothelial cells with endotoxin; c) exposure of erythrocytes only to endotoxin; d) incubation of endothelial cells only to endotoxin; and e) both the endothelial cells and erythrocytes incubated with different concentrations of endotoxin. Erythrocyte adhesion in the saline control group was 71 +/- 8 cells/mm2. Incubation of both components with endotoxin increased the number of adhesive erythrocytes to 172 +/- 9 cells/mm2 (p < .05). When only the endothelial cells were treated with endotoxin, 142 +/- 8 cells/mm2 adhered to the endothelial monolayer, whereas the incubation of the erythrocytes only to endotoxin resulted in adhesion of 102 +/- 3 cells/mm2. Decreasing concentrations of endotoxin reduced adhesion from 172 +/- 9 cells/mm2 (endotoxin, 75 microg/mL) to 165 +/- 9 cells/mm2 (endotoxin, 25 microg/mL), 153 +/- 4 cells/mm2 (endotoxin, 1 microg/mL), and 146 +/- 6.1 cells/mm2 (endotoxin, 5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure of human erythrocytes and human venous vascular endothelial cells to an inflammatory stimulus such as endotoxin promotes a dose-dependent adhesion of erythrocytes to endothelium in a dynamic environment. These adhesive erythrocyte-endothelium interactions can be produced by exposure of either red blood cells or endothelial cells to endotoxin, with a higher degree of adhesion after activation of the endothelial cell component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207