MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995510665 · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(12)39638-9

Towards an HIV-free generation: getting to zero or getting to rights?

2012· article· en· W1995510665 on OpenAlexaff
Amina Chitembo, Sophie Dilmitis, Olive Edwards, C.E. Foote, Leasuwanna Griffiths, Svetlana Moroz, Lydia Mungherera, Lillian Mworeko, Jo Manchester, Shari Margolese, Angelina Namiba, Susan J. Paxton, Gracia Violeta Ross, Sita Shahi, Susan Alice Welbourn

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health Matters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenness to experienceHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Reproductive healthHuman rightsNorm (philosophy)Reproductive rightsPolitical scienceWork (physics)SociologyPublic relationsGender studiesEconomic growthPopulationMedicineLawPsychologySocial psychologyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“[We] ask the scientific arena to appeal to the actual lived experience of women; whether to have children is among one of the most sacred, emotional and private decisions that at-risk and HIV-posi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.031
Scholarly communication0.0080.017
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0120.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive Health MattersSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207