Alexithymie in einer klinischen Stichprobe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), is currently the most widely used measure of alexithymia. An alternative measure of alexithymic characteristics is the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS). Aim of the study was to investigate, wether LEAS and TAS-20 scores are associated with interpersonal problems, sociodemografic variables, and psychological strain in a construct conform direction. METHODS: 146 psychosomatically ill in-patients completed the TAS-20, the LEAS, the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) and the inventory for the assessment of interpersonal problems (IIP-D). RESULTS: Low emotional awareness (LEAS) was associated with male gender, absence of a stable partnership and low educational level. In contrast to LEAS, TAS-20 was significantly correlated with the majority of the SCL-90-R and IIP scales. CONCLUSIONS: The correlations between TAS-20 and IIP scales may be an indication for the validity of the measurement. The association between low emotional awareness and sociodemografic variables are costructconform and indicate a strong relationship between LEAS and variables, that represent real life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".