MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995543118 · doi:10.1177/1548512913509031

An Approximate Dynamic Programming heuristic to support non-strategic project selection for the Royal Canadian Navy

2013· article· en· W1995543118 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brent Fisher, Jack Brimberg, W. J. Hurley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnapsack problemHeuristicSelection (genetic algorithm)NavyOperations researchDynamic programmingComputer scienceHeuristicsMathematical optimizationFraction (chemistry)Greedy algorithmSimple (philosophy)Continuous knapsack problemEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider an Approximate Dynamic Programming heuristic to support the selection of defense projects when projects have different values and are originated intermittently but fairly frequently. We show that a simple policy reserving a positive fraction of the available budget for high-value projects not yet originated is superior to a greedy knapsack approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology TechnologySame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207