Fibre reinforced polymer strengthening of the Sainte-Émélie-de-l'Énergie bridge: design, instrumentation, and field testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental research project was undertaken to evaluate the need to strengthen existing reinforced concrete bridges belonging to the Ministère des Transports du Québec. A typical bridge consisting of a single-span bridge with T-shaped sections was identified. Evaluation of the bridge showed that an increase in bending strength and shear strength would be necessary to satisfy current loading conditions and code requirements. The increase in bending strength was obtained by bonding carbon-reinforced composite materials to the underface of the beams, with fibres in the longitudinal direction. External U-shaped stirrups made of glass-reinforced composite materials were installed on the outside faces of the beams in order to increase their shear strength. This paper presents a selection of experimental results initially obtained on T-section beams, scaled 1:3 with respect to the bridge under consideration. The actual reinforcement scheme selected for the bridge is then presented, accompanied by comments on the construction process. Conventional instrumentation and fibre optic sensors were incorporated to the repair work in order to evaluate the behaviour of the bridge, before and after strengthening. Initial results of this ongoing evaluation are presented here.Key words: bridge strengthening, FRP, composite materials, instrumentation, field testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".